Hello, you know the user review you submitted could not be approved because it's directly bound to the unjustified complaint: "The player from the United Kingdom reported that Heats Casino had blocked his account just minutes before a cashback, resulting in a loss of approximately £550. He expressed concern about scams within the casino. We reviewed the case and determined that the cashback funds had not yet been credited to his account at the time of closure, and no real money balance was withheld. According to the casino's terms, cashback could be withheld at the casino's discretion and was not payable on closed accounts. Therefore, the complaint was rejected as the casino did not withhold legitimate real-money winnings."
Consequently in light of those findings, it is not logical to approve a review saying that the casino is a scam.
I understand it's not likable from your position, but the reviews should include as unbiased information as possible. Im sorry.
Αυτόματη μετάφραση: