Hello,
I believe the situation is understandable, although I can see why you disagree with the ending. Maybe it would be best not to focus on getting a refund but to stay away from casinos. It was not about being paid the winnings but about getting a refund; is that so?
"Sadly, our point of view is that we are unable to ask for a refund on your behalf if you only asked for self-exclusion once, even if the reason given was that you struggled with gambling issues. If you don't receive feedback on a self-exclusion request, our recommendation is to pursue the issue further, like you did eventually on November 2nd via live chat."
"The player from Nova Scotia requested a refund of $320 after losing control and depositing funds at Wyns Casino, despite having submitted an email for account closure due to responsible gambling issues. He felt that the casino had not followed its own procedures for closure and had denied his refund request. The Complaints Team concluded that they were unable to assist with the refund as only one self-exclusion request had been made, and it was advised that players should follow up if they did not receive a response. Consequently, the complaint was closed."
I know it sounds like we don't care, but we believe direct cooperation with the casino is partly the players' responsibility too.
Well, I respect your experience, and if you ever want to discuss how to self-exclude efectivelly, the forum is here.
Αυτόματη μετάφραση: