Here you have a clear reason why the decision was made as it was: "The issue was rejected by the Complaints Team, which concluded that the player would only be entitled to a refund if the self-exclusion had been requested due to a gambling problem, which was not the case here. Consequently, the complaint was closed."
To the rest I don't know if I should comment at all because I see that you have your truth and therefore I will probably hardly tell you something. If we were doing it for the casinos and for money, which is not true, you would probably have no case with us. I think that says it all. 21 complaints and so, according to what I've seen, about half resolved, but yes, we are definitely doing it for the casinos and we are getting money for it. I'll just correct you once, because I know there's been some history here, avoid similar biased views or you'll be banned from the forum.
Thank you very much.
Αυτόματη μετάφραση: