It's great you're paying such detailed attention to the game's origin. These days, the matter is more complex, I believe.
Basically, these two won't match:
The product that the casino officially purchased from Playson is the first link - the official article
The second is probably a game that can be played for free and was revealed on the official website - an exhibition piece
Additionally, the first link is associated with your specific game session - ID, the second is a rather common format.
Frankly, proving the game is just a copy of an officially licensed product is quite complicated, and even we are not able to spot duplications without the game provider's guidance. Links are no longer a valid form of identification. As far as I can tell, copies are usually identified by the differences shown during gameplay.
Does it make sense to you?
Αυτόματη μετάφραση: