Hello, I understand the confusion; it's the usual matter included in similar situations, and again, I understand that for players it is not very pleasing. The thing is that casinos generally do not share evidence of such rule breaches with associate accounts; public sharing is completely out of the question simply because the nature of those complaints is related to overall account security, and if shared, may help fraudsters be more than one step ahead of casinos' technical solutions.
So, despite how it may sound, we are not allowed by the casinos to show related proofs, not even with the players in question.
There is always more than one perspective and we have to keep our possibility to get those personal details from the casino, atop, for example, your request; otherwise, we could not investigate future complaints submitted by fellow players.
I personally see no reason why a casino would share something like this information with an internet service provider, but I respect your opinion on this. However, if the casino refuses to provide the same findings to its own licensing provider, though, I guess the operator should explain that to the licensing authority in the first place. At this point I agree it looks weird, but on the other hand, that's between the casino and the licensing body.
Αυτόματη μετάφραση: