Σας ευχαριστώ για την απάντησή σας. Ωστόσο, θα ήθελα να διευκρινίσω μερικά σημαντικά σημεία σχετικά με το Twin Casino και να τονίσω ότι η επιστροφή των 140€ οφείλεται, ανεξάρτητα από την άδεια λειτουργίας του καζίνο.
1. Το Twin Casino απέτυχε να συμμορφωθεί με τις διεθνείς οδηγίες για το Υπεύθυνο Παιχνίδι
Παρόλο που το Twin Casino δεν υπάγεται στη δικαιοδοσία της SRIJ, έχει την υποχρέωση να σέβεται τις διεθνείς πολιτικές προστασίας των παικτών, όπως:
Επαλήθευση ταυτότητας για να αποτρέψει τους αυτο-αποκλεισμένους παίκτες από το να καταθέσουν και να παίξουν.
Αποκλεισμός πρόσβασης σε παίκτες που έχουν αναφέρει προβλήματα τζόγου.
Εφαρμογή αποτελεσματικών προληπτικών μέτρων για την αποφυγή εκμετάλλευσης ευάλωτων παικτών.
Το Twin Casino απέτυχε σε αυτές τις υποχρεώσεις, επιτρέποντάς μου να εγγραφώ, να καταθέσω και να χάσω χρήματα χωρίς προηγούμενη επαλήθευση.
2. Το αίτημα αυτο-αποκλεισμού δεν απαλλάσσει το καζίνο από την επιστροφή των ποσών που κατατέθηκαν
Το επιχείρημα ότι "δεν δικαιούμαι επιστροφή χρημάτων επειδή ζήτησα αυτοαποκλεισμό μετά την απώλεια των χρημάτων" δεν ισχύει:
Η ευθύνη του χειριστή είναι να αποτρέψει τους αυτο-αποκλεισμένους παίκτες από το να καταθέσουν και να παίξουν από την αρχή.
Εάν το Twin Casino είχε συμμορφωθεί με τις αρχές του Responsible Gaming, δεν θα μπορούσα ποτέ να εγγραφώ και να καταθέσω.
Άλλοι χειριστές έχουν ήδη αναγνωρίσει αυτό το λάθος και έχουν επιστρέψει χρήματα σε παρόμοιες περιπτώσεις, αποδεικνύοντας ότι αυτή είναι η σωστή λύση.
3. Το Twin Casino ενδέχεται να αντιμετωπίσει κυρώσεις για αυτήν την πρακτική
Το Twin Casino λειτουργεί υπό την άδεια της Kahnawake Gaming Commission, η οποία απαιτεί αυστηρά μέτρα προστασίας των παικτών. Η μη εφαρμογή αυτών των μέτρων θα μπορούσε να οδηγήσει σε ρυθμιστικές κυρώσεις και να επηρεάσει τη φήμη του καζίνο.
Έχω ήδη αναφέρει αυτήν την κατάσταση στις ακόλουθες οντότητες:
Επιτροπή τυχερών παιχνιδιών Kahnawake (KGC) - Για διερεύνηση μη συμμόρφωσης με κανονισμούς υπεύθυνου τυχερού παιχνιδιού.
Τράπεζα και EUPAGO (MBWay) - Για να αμφισβητήσετε πληρωμές που υποβλήθηκαν σε ακατάλληλη επεξεργασία.
Ενώσεις μέσων ενημέρωσης και προστασίας των καταναλωτών - Για να αποκαλυφθεί αυτή η καταχρηστική πρακτική.
Συμπέρασμα - Η επιστροφή χρημάτων 140 € πρέπει να γίνει
Το Twin Casino δεχόταν καταθέσεις και στοιχήματα χωρίς να διασφαλίζει ότι ο παίκτης ήταν ικανός να παίξει, παραβιάζοντας τις βασικές αρχές του Υπεύθυνου Παιχνιδιού. Επιπλέον, μόλις συνειδητοποίησα ότι δεν τηρήθηκε ο αυτοαποκλεισμός, ζήτησα αμέσως να κλείσει ο λογαριασμός.
Δεδομένου ότι οι καταθέσεις έγιναν δεκτές παράτυπα και χωρίς συμμόρφωση με τους κανόνες προστασίας των παικτών, απαιτώ πλήρη επιστροφή των 140 €.
Αναμένω τη θέση σας σχετικά με αυτό το αίτημα.
Thank you for your reply. However, I would like to clarify a few important points about Twin Casino and reinforce that the 140€ refund is due, regardless of the license under which the casino operates.
1. Twin Casino has failed to comply with international Responsible Gaming guidelines
Even though Twin Casino is not under the jurisdiction of SRIJ, it has an obligation to respect international player protection policies, including:
Identity verification to prevent self-excluded players from depositing and playing.
Blocking access to players who have reported gambling problems.
Implementing effective preventative measures to avoid exploitation of vulnerable players.
Twin Casino has failed in these obligations by allowing me to register, deposit and lose money without any prior verification.
2. The self-exclusion request does not exempt the casino from refunding the amounts deposited
The argument that "I am not entitled to a refund because I requested self-exclusion after losing the money" is not valid:
The operator's responsibility is to prevent self-excluded players from depositing and playing from the start.
If Twin Casino had complied with the principles of Responsible Gaming, I would never have been able to register and deposit.
Other operators have already recognized this mistake and refunded in similar situations, demonstrating that this is the correct solution.
3. Twin Casino may face sanctions for this practice
Twin Casino operates under the license of the Kahnawake Gaming Commission, which requires strict player protection measures. Failure to implement these measures could result in regulatory sanctions and impact the casino's reputation.
I have already reported this situation to the following entities:
Kahnawake Gaming Commission (KGC) - For investigation of non-compliance with responsible gaming regulations.
Bank and EUPAGO (MBWay) - To contest payments that were improperly processed.
Media and consumer protection associations - To expose this abusive practice.
Conclusion - The €140 Refund Must Be Made
Twin Casino accepted deposits and bets without ensuring that the player was fit to play, violating the basic principles of Responsible Gaming. Furthermore, as soon as I realized that the self-exclusion was not being respected, I immediately requested that the account be closed.
Given that the deposits were accepted irregularly and without complying with player protection rules, I demand a full refund of €140.
I await your position on this request.
Obrigado pela sua resposta. No entanto, gostaria de esclarecer alguns pontos importantes sobre o Twin Casino e reforçar que o reembolso dos 140€ é devido, independentemente da licença sob a qual o casino opera.
1. O Twin Casino falhou em cumprir as diretrizes internacionais de Jogo Responsável
Mesmo que o Twin Casino não esteja sob a jurisdição do SRIJ, ele tem a obrigação de respeitar as políticas internacionais de proteção ao jogador, incluindo:
Verificação de identidade para impedir que jogadores autoexcluídos depositem e joguem.
Bloqueio de acessos a jogadores que informaram problemas de jogo.
Implementação de medidas preventivas eficazes para evitar a exploração de jogadores vulneráveis.
O Twin Casino falhou nessas obrigações ao permitir que eu me registasse, depositasse e perdesse dinheiro sem qualquer verificação prévia.
2. O pedido de autoexclusão não isenta o casino de reembolsar os valores depositados
O argumento de que eu "não tenho direito a reembolso porque solicitei a autoexclusão depois de perder o dinheiro" não é válido, pois:
A responsabilidade do operador é impedir que jogadores autoexcluídos depositem e joguem desde o início.
Se o Twin Casino tivesse cumprido os princípios de Jogo Responsável, eu nunca teria conseguido registrar-me e depositar.
Outros operadores já reconheceram esse erro e procederam ao reembolso em situações semelhantes, demonstrando que essa é a solução correta.
3. O Twin Casino pode enfrentar sanções por essa prática
O Twin Casino opera sob a licença da Kahnawake Gaming Commission, que exige medidas rigorosas de proteção ao jogador. A falha em implementar essas medidas pode resultar em sanções regulatórias e impacto na reputação do casino.
Já reportei essa situação às seguintes entidades:
Kahnawake Gaming Commission (KGC) – Para investigação do não cumprimento das normas de jogo responsável.
Banco e EUPAGO (MBWay) – Para contestação dos pagamentos processados indevidamente.
Meios de comunicação social e associações de defesa do consumidor – Para expor essa prática abusiva.
Conclusão – O Reembolso de 140€ Deve Ser Efetuado
O Twin Casino aceitou depósitos e apostas sem garantir que o jogador estava apto a jogar, violando os princípios básicos de Jogo Responsável. Além disso, assim que percebi que a autoexclusão não estava a ser respeitada, solicitei imediatamente o encerramento da conta.
Dado que os depósitos foram aceitos de maneira irregular e sem cumprir as normas de proteção ao jogador, exijo o reembolso integral de 140€.
Aguardo o vosso posicionamento sobre este pedido.
Αυτόματη μετάφραση: