Σας ευχαριστώ για την απάντησή σας. Ωστόσο, θα ήθελα να διευκρινίσω μερικά κρίσιμα σημεία σχετικά με το DragonSlots και να τονίσω ότι η επιστροφή των 45 € οφείλεται ανεξάρτητα από την άδεια λειτουργίας του καζίνο.
1. Το DragonSlots παραβίασε τις διεθνείς οδηγίες για το Υπεύθυνο Παιχνίδι
Ανεξάρτητα από τη δικαιοδοσία υπό την οποία λειτουργεί, το DragonSlots έχει την υποχρέωση να ακολουθεί τις διεθνείς αρχές προστασίας των παικτών, όπως:
Επαλήθευση ταυτότητας πριν επιτρέψετε τις καταθέσεις και τα στοιχήματα, ειδικά για παίκτες που αποκλείονται από τον εαυτό τους.
Αποκλεισμός πρόσβασης σε παίκτες που αναφέρουν πρόβλημα τζόγου και ζητούν αυτοαποκλεισμό.
Εφαρμογή αποτελεσματικών προληπτικών μέτρων για την πρόληψη της εκμετάλλευσης ευάλωτων παικτών.
Το DragonSlots απέτυχε σε αυτές τις υποχρεώσεις, επιτρέποντάς μου να εγγραφώ, να καταθέσω και να παίξω, παρόλο που έχω αποκλειστεί από το 2022.
2. Το αίτημα για αυτο-αποκλεισμό δεν απαλλάσσει το καζίνο από την επιστροφή των ποσών που κατατέθηκαν
Το επιχείρημα ότι "δεν δικαιούμαι επιστροφή χρημάτων επειδή ζήτησα αυτο-αποκλεισμό μετά το παιχνίδι" είναι αβάσιμο:
Η ευθύνη του χειριστή είναι να αποτρέψει τους αυτο-αποκλεισμένους παίκτες από το να καταθέσουν και να παίξουν από την αρχή.
Αν το DragonSlots είχε συμμορφωθεί με τις καλές πρακτικές Υπεύθυνου Παιχνιδιού, δεν θα μπορούσα ποτέ να δημιουργήσω λογαριασμό, να καταθέσω και να παίξω.
Άλλοι χειριστές έχουν ήδη αναγνωρίσει αυτό το λάθος και έχουν επιστρέψει χρήματα σε παρόμοιες περιπτώσεις, αποδεικνύοντας ότι αυτή είναι η σωστή λύση.
3. Οι DragonSlots θα μπορούσαν να αντιμετωπίσουν κυρώσεις για αυτές τις πρακτικές
Το DragonSlots λειτουργεί με διεθνή άδεια τυχερών παιχνιδιών, πράγμα που σημαίνει ότι έχει ρυθμιστικές υποχρεώσεις που του απαιτούν να εφαρμόζει αυστηρά μέτρα προστασίας των παικτών. Η μη συμμόρφωση με αυτές τις οδηγίες μπορεί να οδηγήσει σε κυρώσεις, πρόστιμα και ακόμη και ανάκληση άδειας.
Έχω ήδη αναφέρει αυτή την κατάσταση στους ακόλουθους φορείς:
Curacao Gaming Control Board (CGCB) - Σε εξέλιξη έρευνα για παραβίαση των αρχών του Responsible Gaming.
Τράπεζα και EUPAGO (MBWay) - Αίτημα αμφισβήτησης πληρωμών που υποβλήθηκαν σε ακατάλληλη επεξεργασία.
Ενώσεις μέσων ενημέρωσης και προστασίας καταναλωτών - Δημόσια έκθεση των παράτυπων πρακτικών του καζίνο.
Συμπέρασμα - Η επιστροφή χρημάτων των 45 € πρέπει να γίνει
Το DragonSlots δέχτηκε καταθέσεις και στοιχήματα χωρίς να συμμορφώνεται με τις βασικές υποχρεώσεις προστασίας των παικτών, επιτρέποντας την αυτο-αποκλεισμένη πρόσβαση. Επιπλέον, μόλις συνειδητοποίησα ότι δεν τηρήθηκε ο αυτοαποκλεισμός, ζήτησα αμέσως να κλείσει ο λογαριασμός.
Δεδομένου ότι οι καταθέσεις έγιναν δεκτές παράτυπα και χωρίς να τηρούνται οι κανόνες του Υπεύθυνου Παιχνιδιού, απαιτώ πλήρη επιστροφή των 45€.
Αναμένω τη θέση σας σχετικά με αυτό το αίτημα.
Thank you for your reply. However, I would like to clarify a few crucial points about DragonSlots and reinforce that the €45 refund is due regardless of the license under which the casino operates.
1. DragonSlots violated international Responsible Gaming guidelines
Regardless of the jurisdiction under which it operates, DragonSlots has an obligation to follow international player protection principles, including:
Verifying identity before allowing deposits and bets, especially for self-excluded players.
Blocking access to players who report problem gambling and request self-exclusion.
Implementing effective preventative measures to prevent the exploitation of vulnerable players.
DragonSlots has failed in these obligations by allowing me to register, deposit and play, even though I have been self-excluded since 2022.
2. The request for self-exclusion does not exempt the casino from refunding the amounts deposited
The argument that "I'm not entitled to a refund because I requested self-exclusion after playing" is unfounded:
The operator's responsibility is to prevent self-excluded players from depositing and playing from the start.
If DragonSlots had complied with good Responsible Gaming practices, I would never have been able to create an account, deposit and play.
Other operators have already recognized this mistake and refunded in similar situations, demonstrating that this is the correct solution.
3. DragonSlots could face sanctions for these practices
DragonSlots operates under an international gaming license, which means it has regulatory obligations that require it to implement strict player protection measures. Failure to comply with these guidelines can result in sanctions, fines and even license revocation.
I have already reported this situation to the following bodies:
Curacao Gaming Control Board (CGCB) - Ongoing investigation into violation of Responsible Gaming principles.
Bank and EUPAGO (MBWay) - Request to contest payments processed improperly.
Media and consumer protection associations - Public exposure of the casino's irregular practices.
Conclusion - The 45€ Refund Must Be Made
DragonSlots accepted deposits and bets without complying with basic player protection obligations, allowing self-excluded access. Furthermore, as soon as I realized that the self-exclusion was not being respected, I immediately requested that the account be closed.
Given that the deposits were accepted irregularly and without respecting the rules of Responsible Gaming, I demand a full refund of €45.
I await your position on this request.
Obrigado pela sua resposta. No entanto, gostaria de esclarecer alguns pontos cruciais sobre a DragonSlots e reforçar que o reembolso dos 45€ é devido, independentemente da licença sob a qual o casino opera.
1. A DragonSlots violou as diretrizes internacionais de Jogo Responsável
Independentemente da jurisdição sob a qual opera, a DragonSlots tem a obrigação de seguir princípios internacionais de proteção ao jogador, incluindo:
Verificação de identidade antes de permitir depósitos e apostas, especialmente para jogadores autoexcluídos.
Bloqueio de acessos a jogadores que informam problemas de jogo e solicitam autoexclusão.
Implementação de medidas preventivas eficazes para impedir a exploração de jogadores vulneráveis.
A DragonSlots falhou nessas obrigações ao permitir que eu me registasse, depositasse e jogasse, mesmo estando autoexcluído desde 2022.
2. O pedido de autoexclusão não isenta o casino de reembolsar os valores depositados
O argumento de que "não tenho direito a reembolso porque solicitei a autoexclusão depois de jogar" não tem fundamento, pois:
A responsabilidade do operador é impedir que jogadores autoexcluídos depositem e joguem desde o início.
Se a DragonSlots tivesse cumprido as boas práticas de Jogo Responsável, eu nunca teria conseguido criar uma conta, depositar e jogar.
Outros operadores já reconheceram esse erro e procederam ao reembolso em situações semelhantes, demonstrando que essa é a solução correta.
3. A DragonSlots pode enfrentar sanções por essas práticas
A DragonSlots opera sob uma licença de jogo internacional, o que significa que tem obrigações regulatórias que exigem a implementação de medidas rigorosas de proteção ao jogador. A falha em cumprir essas diretrizes pode resultar em sanções, multas e até na revogação da licença.
Já reportei esta situação às seguintes entidades:
Curacao Gaming Control Board (CGCB) – Investigação em andamento sobre a violação dos princípios de Jogo Responsável.
Banco e EUPAGO (MBWay) – Pedido de contestação dos pagamentos processados indevidamente.
Meios de comunicação social e associações de defesa do consumidor – Exposição pública das práticas irregulares do casino.
Conclusão – O Reembolso de 45€ Deve Ser Efetuado
A DragonSlots aceitou depósitos e apostas sem cumprir as obrigações básicas de proteção ao jogador, permitindo o acesso de um autoexcluído. Além disso, assim que percebi que a autoexclusão não estava a ser respeitada, solicitei imediatamente o encerramento da conta.
Dado que os depósitos foram aceitos de forma irregular e sem respeitar as normas de Jogo Responsável, exijo o reembolso integral de 45€.
Aguardo o vosso posicionamento sobre este pedido.
Αυτόματη μετάφραση: