Hello,
I'd say that I quite understand why the casino recommends using the VPN. They want to keep players by allowing some of them to play games they would normally can't because of the local market restriction. But, and I think we have the same opinion on that, it feels like the casino is not taking its own terms into the consideration. By allowing players to play restricted games, the casino surely risks a good relationship with the game provider, on the other hand, players benefit from this situation.
The most crucial point is that in such case, the casino must not use this against the player (by voiding the winnings collected on the restricted game), that would be totally wrong.
I would recommend taking a screenshot showing the casino suggested using the VPN, just in case the player is accused of breaching the casino's terms by actively using the VPN.
I feel this is not a question about legality, it is a question about fairness.
What do you think?
Αυτόματη μετάφραση: