You’ve pointed out a pattern that is definitely worth checking.
Several accounts being created within a very short period, each leaving only one positive review for the same casino, can understandably look suspicious. At the same time, that alone isn’t enough for us to label the reviews as fake and remove them automatically.
When we assess user reviews, we look at the wider picture as well, things like timing, similarities between reviews, account activity, recurring patterns across related casinos, and other signals that may suggest coordinated or incentivized reviews.
We also try not to remove reviews based only on suspicion. If we have enough evidence that reviews are not genuine or were motivated by the casino, they can be removed.
In this case, I think it’s fair to take another look at the reviews you highlighted. The registration dates and one-review-only pattern are certainly relevant signals, even if they don’t prove anything by themselves.
Thanks for listing the accounts so clearly and trust we are dealing with reviews every day and even if we find the pattern later, user reviews are then deleted. On the other way, sometimes what other players see as 100% fake is not the same in our eyes.
Αυτόματη μετάφραση: